shaping a generation
I can remember watching the moon landing as a little kid – on colour TV because my father was always extravagant about appliances. We were the first in the neighborhood to have one. It did make the whole adventure even more surreal. At that age, you have only just stopped believing the moon is made of green cheese so it was almost like a fairy story.
And at the time it seemed like a fairytale to everyone. It’s hard to believe in the days this message I am typing will be broadcast to the entire world in a matter of minutes all via the magic wizards of the internet. In my mom’s generation, talking about putting a man on the moon sounded like crazy talk.
My mom is only a generation younger than Neil Armstrong. I heard he died last night and he had always seemed an impressive kind of guy so I read an article about him this morning. And was not disappointed.
In one of the world’s greatest ironic moments, the box to click on his story was sitting right next to a box about Snooki. She had a baby apparently. WHY does anyone care?
It got me thinking about generations. It’s a subject that interests me a lot. It all began when I read a magazine article a couple of decades ago that talked about the impact the generation you are born into has on your life. I am often lumped in with the “Baby Boomers” statistically. I think they were the first to ever get a “generation title”.
So the sociology of the Baby Boomers always seems a little suspect to me. I would say a generation is about a decade. Maybe you don’t cut it off precisely at ten years but, give or take a few years, that is a period of time in which the members will have the same types of life experiences and a shared identity. Yet somehow Baby Boomers run from those born in 1946 to those born in 1964. Eighteen years! So the earliest baby boomers can be PARENTS of the same generation? That just doesn’t make sense, people!
I think it means those are the post-war years in the United States where there were a lot of babies born compared to the years before. It points out a lot of interesting facts about generations and the people who define them. I lived in Europe for a few years and my biggest shock was going to some of the places devastated by two world wars and seeing photos of the rubble that had been in the place I was standing in 1945. Most parts of the world were too busy re-building or too poor to be too focused on birthing a bunch of children spoiled enough to take some of the worst traits of the second generation of wealth and apply them to an entire country.
To be born in the 1940s or early 1950s in North America. It was as though almost everyone was a second generation Rockefeller. The ground had been laid. Jobs were easy to find. The middle class was healthy. North Americans still seemed to think there was a place in the world for literacy. It was a glorious time. But, as all the children of privilege who end up dead from a cocaine overdose could tell you, having it too easy doesn’t always work out so well in the end. It ends up in things like Snooki…
I think one of the biggest insults you could do to Neil Armstrong is to put his photo next to Snooki’s! Neil was born in 1930. I checked my facts and technically he was too young to be part of Tom Brokaw’s “Greatest Generation.” But that’s the thing with generations. We are all part of one. And will be labeled whether we like it or not. And we will be influenced by the economy and culture into which we are born. It is an inevitable fact of life. But how we respond – and what we do to improve the image of whatever generations we might get lumped into – is up to us as individuals.
I am sure there will be more talk of generations. Certainly there will be more talk of economics and culture. There is more to be said about the “greatest generation.” But the real lesson we should be learning is that it shouldn’t take strife, hardship and deprivation – and a lot of dead people – to make us act better. But humans are pretty stupid animals despite our oversize brains so it does seem that we aren’t so good at doing the right thing until we are forced into a corner.
That’s what really impressed me about Neil Armstrong. He was famous! Possibly more famous than Prince Harry. Prince Harry would be wise to take a few tips from him 🙂 Not too many people’s sentences are so famous random people all over the world likely know what you said verbatim.
But he cared about space, about science and engineering, about his country, about his integrity. He didn’t sell his soul to become a pitchman to make a ton of money off his fame. He quit signing autographs so people wouldn’t use them for the wrong purpose and gave money to charity when he made a quick buck off something stupid (and made other people do the same). He finally had a biography published but thought long and hard about who would write it.
He used his fame when he thought it could do good, making public statements protesting the dismantling of the US space program. It is a little sad that the United States has become such a crass, materialistic place that this level of integrity by someone who could have so easily exploited his fame (Michael Phelps, you might want to take note 🙂 is almost as impressive and rare as the first man on the moon.
Current generation – think about it. Your generation will be defined by the collective impression left by all its various members. The more of you who take Neil Armstrong as your role model, the better your rep.
Your parents’ generation comes off as self-indulgent, narcissistic and materialist. So, hey, the bar is REALLY low. I see some of you spouting off in the comments section on the internet. Make sure you spend at least as much time in the real world, finding things you believe in, doing something important with your lives – and learning some grammar.
The opinions of people who sound smart and know how to put together a grammatically correct sentence that incorporates facts carry a lot more weight. “That’s one small step for (a) man, one giant leap for mankind.” So much more impressive, inspiring and memorable than “WTF” 😉 And people even worry whether he said the “a”… one giant leap for literacy 🙂





my dark days with Ayn Rand ;)
I am working my ass off right now. Ayn Rand would be proud 🙂 And, yes Republicans, I built it! Really truly. Not the infrastructure, including the highly subsidized education that got me here, you morons, but I am FAR more impressive than Mitt or Paul… of course that great education I got was mostly courtesy of the phenomenal world changing conception invented by the Scots I believe of making free public education available to the masses.
And the scrappy side of my family who taught me to question everything. I should be in bed but Jon Stewart is at the Republican convention and he has rarely been more brilliant. My brain is on fire from watching television. Who would have thunk it?
How I am back thinking about Ayn Rand. It’s been decades… I am not sure if you know about Ayn Rand. She was a crazy Russian novelist who had been through the Russian Revolution as part of the displaced bourgeois. Seems fair she ended up an atheist elitist who hated government.
I have always been a voracious reader, one of those strange people who stressed out at a young age when they realized they would NOT be able to read ALL the books in the library! So instead I had to try and figure out what I should be reading. I asked my twelfth grade English teacher for a list of books to read. And she was the one who told me to read Ayn Rand.
Being young, impressionable and fairly conservative, Objectivism initially seemed attractive. And I was fairly bright and inordinately ambitious. Which is how I built it. A successful consulting practice soon to go into its tenth year. It’s all me. No daddy money. No mentors. Not even a country club membership.
But I wasn’t always so smart. I remember meeting some cute guy on a beach in Bermuda and he said some stuff and I knew he was quoting Ayn Rand and it was a bonding moment.
Thank god I got over it. I am not proud of my Ayn Rand days. Unlike the Republican caucus. I am really grateful to my father. He always talked very conservative and I know I leaned that way because I idolized him and thought he was very worldly and smart. But, because I thought that, when he started questioning my right wing ideas, I really took notice.
And moved toward the center. My mom and I were just talking about what a Canadian patriot he was. And the more I watch American politics, the more proud – and relieved – I am of being Canadian. We do need to pay attention though. We hear their rhetoric too often and it’s easy to be seduced.
Like people are seduced by Ayn Rand. Personally I think “The Fountainhead” and “Atlas Shrugged” are good reads. Especially when you are young and impressionable. But, thanks to my dad, even when I read them the first time, the critical reader in me was always in debate with the author.
Sure, it’s good to promote ambition instead of laziness. Government can get out of control and is not inherently good. But neither are rich people. OMG, I am just learning why Stewart and Colbert have been talking about Ayn Rand so much and bringing up my fond memories of using “Atlas Shrugged” as a pretense to make out on a beach in Bermuda.
Paul Ryan’s views are far more scary! And obviously he IS an idiot. I thought his economic policies made it obvious already – but apparently he didn’t realize Ayn Rand was an atheist. Seriously, dude? He makes his staff read the novels anyway… some kind of sneaky Republican diluted, confused, pretending to be intellectual message… read this – but only take note of part of the message… sounds pretty Republican to me 🙂
Remember – government builds infrastructure. Education is good. A great education that actually teaches you to think rationally is even better. So you can tell Ayn Rand to go to hell – altruism is good, you bitch. Selfishness and unregulated capitalism are what’s gonna take us down. And she is dead, having been born in likely the greatest capitalist economic sweet spot in the history of mankind, so why would she care…
Colbert is just interviewing an Ayn Rand expert. Gotta love these boys. Some of the stuff Ayn Rand said wasn’t bullshit. Self reliance is good. Mixing religion and politics is bad. Apparently just before she died she denounced Reagan for bringing religion into politics. So she would slug Paul Ryan. And Mitt Romney? She must be rolling in her grave! That’s what you get for promoting crap values and trying to bring the world down, lady. But thanks for the make out session on the beach in Bermuda – it was cinematic 😉
And Republicans… Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert – and all their viewers – love you. Keep talking crap! As Jon so brilliantly showcased tonight, you dudes sound like Charlie Sheen. SERIOUSLY??? I know The Expendables 2 will likely play better in foreign markets and exporting your “culture” seems to be on track, but people, you are electing the most powerful man in the world. He should be someone the rest of the world is in awe of, not a gift to smart comedians. If only Jon Stewart would run for President…
But first you would have to build the infrastructure to educate enough people to actually understand what he says… it’s brilliant…
http://www.thecomedynetwork.ca/Shows/TheDailyShow
Everyone with a brain should watch tonight’s episode. It will make you feel better about the world, if only fleetingly 😉
Category:
life philosophy, social commentary
Tagged with: